TMC2130 does not cooperate :-(

Trinamic drivers are a marvel of engineering. However they combined many things in a single chip that it is hard to make it all work right. Well, it is hard for me at least, if you have mastered these drivers please let me know.

It started when I tried to test if the Marlin firmware for my board would agree to move the stepper motors around. To test the motor driver signals on the board I modified one of the tmc2130 arduino library samples like this, and it was spinning the motor. Alas my enthusiasm was short lived, when I tried to move the motor with Marlin, it would stutter and vibrate, but no motion.

Hmm, I checked and re-checked all the tmc2130 driver settings back and forth. Read the datasheet 3 times – nothing. I was going back and forth between the marlin firmware and my little test program to figure out what was wrong. Finally I was able to isolate the issue to the number of microsteps the driver was configured to take.

Now to be fair the microstepping configuration was not the issue per se, it was a setting I can change to introduce the same problem in my test program as well.

Let’s take a step back and explain what this all means. Stepper motors come in many different configurations. We’ll focus on bipolar 2 phase motors – these are the most common stepper type used for 3D printers. By far the majority of these motors are manufactured to make 200 steps per full rotation. Each step being 1.8°. There also high resolution motors which make 400 steps per rotation or 0.9° for each step. For the purpose of this description the difference is irrelevant.

In the 1.8° motors, it is common to say the 200 steps are “full steps”. In other words the rotor rotates from one stable position to another. In electrical terms, each motor coil is energized fully in one direction or the other.

Clever folk however discovered that they could achieve better precision if they don’t fully energize the motor coils – hence micro-stepping. The most obvious downside of the microstepping is reduced motor holding torque. There are different microstepping options offered by different stepper motor driver chips. Most common are 2, 4, 8 or 16 microsteps. This means that the driver would use 400, 800, 1600, 3200 microsteps to make a full rotation of the motor shaft. Some drivers offer 32 microsteps as option. The tmc2130 and other drivers from Trinamic also offer 64, 128 as well as whooping 256 microsteps. That is astounding 51, 200 microsteps per rotation or about 0.007° per microstep.

Before you get too excited, keep in mind each increase of the microstepping level comes at the expense of decrease in torque.

All these wanders aside, what was my issue with microstepping? I made a simple observation: my test program was driving the motor stepping pin at about 48kHz; with the default settings (256 microsteps) the motor would move, but when I switch to 16 microsteps the motor would make a high pitch sound, but not move. Why? I was puzzled.

Another week of experiments and I discovered the most benign of reasons – I was driving the step pin too fast. In the 256 microsteps configuration the motor speed would be a little under 56 rpm. In the 16 microsteps configuration it would be about 900 rpm. This was above the physical capabilities of the motor with that setup. I found this calculator and it seems with 0.6A current at 12V this motor could theoretically do about 850 rpm max. Practical measurements showed that even at 32 microsteps the motor has trouble moving. At 64 microsteps it was working.

But why does this matter? Well I found that marlin’s default speed is a 300mm/s. I did not change the default axis per mm configuration it was set to 78.74 for 16 microsteps. This would translate to 23,622 microsteps/s or 443 rpm for the motor. Practical test showed this motor was able to achieve about 230rpm max.

Now what? Very simple – I lowered the motor default speed in marlin and was able to issue commands to move the axis 😉

While I was investigating the issue. I got myself a current probe for my oscilloscope. I was able to shoot a few pretty pictures of the driver current of the motor coil trough some different driver settings.

The current probe I got was Hantek C-65:

Picture of the motor driven with full steps an no load. This graph represents the current that goes trough one of the motor coils. There are two coils that drive the motor, the current trough the other coil is identical, but shifted one quarter pulse (90°). The current swings from positive to negative each 2 full steps.

Current waveform with the driver configured for 2 microsteps and 600mA RMS current:

Waveform for 4 microsteps configuration:

Waveform with 16 microsteps:

The waveform with 256 microsteps looks like a smooth sine wave. Sorry I dodn’t manage to get a picture.

This driver has an interesting feature – microstep interpolation. When you enable it, the driver uses 256 microsteps internally and whatever you had configured externally. For example here is the waveform with 2 microsteps and interpolation enabled:

The following is the waveform for full step (no microstepping) and interpolation enabled:

The last image I thought was cool was a capture of the driver waveform changing when the motor is stalled. The configuration is 256 microsteps, with 300mA current. I was trying to stop the motor by holding the shaft with my hand.

Gerber Viewer updated UI

Some time ago I wrote an online Gerber file viewer. I’ve been using it to validate the KiCad Gerber output files, before I sent them to the PCB manufacturer. One feature that was missing was the ability to set transparency on the layers, when more than one layer is selected for display.

As I started working on that, I realized that I also need to be able to select the color for the layer as well. Here are a few screenshots of the viewer in action.

Two layer PCB, top layer is red, the bottom is green:

Six layer PCB (Beagle Bone XM) with top and two internal signal layers selected:

The same Beagle Bone XM board with 6 layers selected:

PrntrBoard V1 updated with thermocouple interface

After a few idle weeks, I finally decided to order the current rev1 of the TMC2130 board design. I found this web site (pcbshopper.com) which compares the price of various PCB manufacturers and matches them with your board specifications.

As luck would have it, a day after I sent the files to the board manufacturer (jlcpcb for the rev1), I had an idea of adding thermocouple interface.

Here is the rev2 of the board with dual thermocouple connectors. It should work with MAX31856, MAX31855 as well as the good old MAX6675 chips. All of these are based on some form of SPI interface, and I just added them to the bus.

Because I used all I/O pins, if you decide you need thermocouples, you’ll have to sacrifice the two controllable extruder cooling fans. Most 3d printers come with “always on” cooling fans anyway.

The thermocouple connectors use generic SPI(MISO, MOSI, SCK, CS) + 5V power and GND pins. In theory one could connect other things, with appropriate software patch.

PrntrBoard – bringing it to live May 13th.

In my previous tests my PrntrBoard prototype was having some issues talking to the TMC2130 motor driver chip. It took a while, but I figured out the issue – the SPI library was not initializing correctly, so the chip was using the SPI0, hardware block, while on my board the drivers are hooked to SPI1 pins.

A few configuration settings later and Marlin was booting up, without complaining. In the process of debugging I also created a small test program to control the motor driver. You can see it here.

From that work I found that the motor driver chip was getting quite hot if I set the motor current at 900mA. The default was 600mA – it was getting warm but not as bad. Anyhow I decided I want to further stress the thermal design of the board and ordered this 4 channel thermometer.

The thermometer arrived today and I set to use it for a few tests. Keep in mind the accuracy of the thermometer is questionable at this point. I did a very simple test:

  • at ambient room temperature all 4 channels showed values within 0.3 degree Celsius.
  • I held all 4 probes in my hand and all 4 showed 35.1C – again within 0.2C of each other.

First I tried to test the extruder heater control logic. From previous attempts I know it was working, but I wanted to see how accurate the temperature is. I set the printer to heat the E1 to 180C:

M104 T1 S180

This is a video from that test. My thermometer shower 163.5C or thereabouts – so there is a significant offset between the firmware and the thermometer. I also verified with an infrared thermometer and it was showing ~160C. So it seems the thermistor setting is not quite correct. The bad thing is that this heater came from China and I have no clue what thermistor they used, so I’ll have to measure it a few times to determine the correct parameters that should go in the firmware. That would be a post on its own.

Disappointed from my temperature control test, I set to test the thermal design of the board. I added a thermocouple to the bottom of the board – where the motor driver ship is mounted.

as well as a second thermocouple on top of the chip

This was to test a theory, which suggested that the chip dissipates more heat on the bottom side.

Attempt one was not very conclusive. This was using Marlin, I enabled the extruder motor and with the default settings it had 600mA of drive current and 300mA standby current, but this was not enough. The driver chip was barely at 30C and both top and bottom were at similar temperature.

Attempt two almost ended in a disaster. I used the above test program to make the motor running with 900mA drive current, but the program had an unfortunate side effect of leaving the extruder heater on. I smelled smoke and turned the power off. The smoke smell was from the extruder heater melting the temperature probe cable.

Crisis averted and on to attempt number three. My test program was spinning the motor, the power consumption was about 0.5A at 12V. The chip was heating with steady rate, even with my big fan blowing over the board. It was clear the board would not sustain such current. However the top and bottom of the chip were within 1-2C of each other. I decided that maybe the fan was interfering with the measurements and thus ensued attempt number five.

The chip was heating rapidly, but finally you can see the top was 5C hotter than the bottom. Another observation was how quickly things cooled down after the power was turned off.

After all this what is the conclusion:

  • the motor driver does get hot on the top, so putting a radiator on the top has some merit
  • my thermal design sucks, and I decided to re-route the bottom of the board, so there is a large copper area with no traces which can dissipate the heat from the chip.
  • the thermistor coefficient needs to be calibrated in the firmware
  • on the bright side almost all controls are working and Marlin is operational to a degree.

Well, ’till next time

~V

Prntr Board V1

Prntr Board V1

PrntrBoard is a 3D printer controller board designed to work with STM32 NUCLEO dev kits. The current version (V1) supports NUCLEO-64 series kits. The design is being developed on F446-RE kit, but other models could work as well. IMO the STM32F446 NUCLEO-64 kit offers very good performance (180MHz CPU) for the price ($15).

Some features of the board:

  • 5x Trinamic super quiet drivers (TMC2130 or TMC2660)
  • Marlin firmware
  • 4x controllable fans and 2x “always on” fan connectors
  • selectable fan voltage (5V or Vin)

Because the NUCLEO-64 has limited number of IO pins, some compromises had to be made:

  • No sd-card
  • No display support

Generic shortcuts I don’t plan to improve:

  • 5V power supply is external. These are available from various resellers and fairly cheap – less than $1. No need to waste board layout space and component count.
  • Heated bed MOSFET – large heated beds consume a lot of power, and it is challenging to provision the design for > 10A current. External heated bed MOSFETs are very affordable < $10 and claim to support 20A minimum. If you have large bet use one.

Details

I use the daily build of KiCad (soon to be released V5) – let me know if you have trouble opening the files.

Once the design is validated I would add support for NUCLEO-144 kits, these have many more available I/O pins, which would enable more extruders, SD-card and LCD screen utilities to be added. The downside is that they are quite big and I’m trying to limit the design to 10x10cm to reduce the cost of the PCB fabrication.

The current design is using 4 layer board, 6/6 mil clearance, 12 mil via hole size and 20 mil via diameter.

There are two active branches:

  • tmc2130 – the board design for TMC2130 series drivers
  • master – the board design for TMC2660 drivers

Both PCB designs use the QFP version of the driver ICs because they can handle a bit more power.

Status

I have made prototypes of the TMC2130 board design (rev0) – the board has a few bugs, that are corrected in the rev1 version. I have validated the heaters, and fan controls are operational. Working the kinks out of the motor driver wiring.

The TMC2660 branch status is: the rev0 board is fully routed and passes DRC checks. I have not made any prototypes of the board, because 2660 drivers are hard to find due to low stock levels at suppliers.

Software

The software for the board is a clone of Marlin at bugfix-2.0.x branch of my repository. I keep it relatively in sync with the Marlin branch. Note: there are other branches of Marlin as well only the bugfix-2.0.x supports the STM32 microcontroller.

Marlin is using Arduino IDE or Platform IO. I personally had issues with Platform IO not supporting the STM32F4 board, so I use Arduino version 1.8.5. To compile the firmware code, you would need to install the STM32 Arduino port.

Leave a comment if you have any questions.

How to mount Cut Tape parts on CHMT48VB and other desktop Pick and Place machines

I had to load some more components on my trusty Pick and Place machine and decided to document the process for all the Internet to see.

If you are not made from money, chances are you have encountered this problem. Sometimes it is too expensive to order a whole reel of parts. So what to do with a cut tape of 100 or so components?

Most distributors offer a “reel” service – that is they would make your cut-tape onto a reel – this would save you all this trouble. I personally found this solution to drastically increase your price per component though. For example, a cut tape of 100 capacitors, would cost you $1-$3, the tape reel service is $7, which is more than twice the price for the components.

On some machines, you can cut a small strip, just long enough for the job and use the “IC tray” mode. But what if we can do better?

First, you need a reel where to put the components. You can 3D print one – I made a model here. It is two pieces (left and right) you can print separately. It is standard 178mm reel. I have printed both 8mm and 12mm wide versions, by adjusting the hub width. Initially, I tried 130mm diameter reel because it is suitable for smaller 3D printers, but it was a pain to work with on the machine. It was too small to stay on its own, and I had to put it on the the reel shaft. This, in turn, was a major issue every time you have to replace a component you have to remove all reels. So please use 178mm it would save you lots of pain.

Anyhow the reel is easy to put together, just print the left and right part, align them together and press. There is a little hole on the hub to feed the cut tape make sure the left and right part line together. It should look something like this:

You can see the cut tape of 0402 capacitors I’m going to use underneath. Make sure when you put the tape on the reel, you wind it in the correct direction – the tape sprocket holes should be on the correct side.

For example, this, turns out, was the wrong way for my machine:

Anyhow here is it wound up the right way.

This is all and good, but to properly install the reel in the pick and place machine you would need about one foot of plastic tape from the reel. The normal reels have about 30-40cm of empty space so that you can thread the tape through the mechanism. With the cut tape this means losing quite a bit of components.

Not to worry I have just the trick for you. For 8mm wide cut tape use this wonderful 3M product I found on Amazon –  0.188″ tape. The one I use looks like this:

For 12mm wide cut tape use 1/4″ 3M tape, for example, this one.

You would need to cut two pieces of sticky tape one about a foot – enough to get from your pick and place pickup to the tape collection wheel and wind on the wheel about once. The second piece about one to one and a half inch.

First you snake the longer piece of tape on the pick and place machine – follow the normal path for tape collection and make sure the tape is not twisted. I stick it a little on the collection wheel as well as on the pick and place pickup wheel.

It helps if you put the tape on the next position, where you insert the cut tape.

Now, peel off the plastic tape from the component tape for about an inch. You would lose 10-15 components – it is a worthy sacrifice. Why an inch? As you can see in the picture, I have to guide the tape about that distance to make sure it is not stuck anywhere. If your machine uses different setup adjust the length as needed. You cannot go smaller than 1/3 (one stapler size) inch though you’ll see why in a few paragraphs.

Insert the cut tape in the machine as if it was a regular tape, then tape the short piece of 3M tape over the peeled plastic tape. I use this to increase the plastic tape strength, because my machine pulls like there is no tomorrow.

Now turn the tape over and stick the long piece of tape on the opposite side.

Just like this:

Finally put a stapler on the small segment. The sticky tape alone would not hold to the pull force of the machine. The stapler would ensure the “mechanism” stays together.

Make sure you lock all 3 pieces with the stapler – the two tricky tape pieces as well as the plastic tape between them. I found that micro staples work for me. For example this Amazon item.

Here is how it should look like:

Finally, place the other end of the 3M tape over the collection wheel and pick up the slack:

Enjoy.